What enhances the credibility of evaluation findings according to the concept of data triangulation?

The enhancement of the credibility of evaluation findings through data triangulation stems from the combination of various methods and sources. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the subject being evaluated, as it incorporates different perspectives and types of data. By using multiple methods—such as qualitative interviews, quantitative surveys, and observational studies—evaluators can cross-validate findings, leading to more robust and reliable conclusions.

When data from different sources converge on the same outcomes, it strengthens the validity of those findings, making it more likely that the results are accurate and reflective of the true situation. This multidimensional perspective helps mitigate biases or limitations that may occur when relying on a single method or source of data. Thus, the overall conclusion drawn from the evaluation is substantiated through this triangulation, enhancing its credibility and applicability.