Which of the following best describes evaluation planning?

Evaluation planning is best described as developing a comprehensive approach with specific timelines. This process involves setting clear objectives, determining the methods and criteria for evaluation, establishing timelines for when various components of the evaluation will occur, and specifying the resources needed. A well-structured evaluation plan ensures that the evaluation is systematic, organized, and aligned with the goals of the program or project being assessed.

Through effective evaluation planning, one can ensure that all necessary aspects are considered, including the types of data to be collected, who will collect it, how it will be analyzed, and when results will be reported. This strategic approach is vital for assessing the effectiveness of interventions and for making informed decisions based on the evaluation outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of structure in evaluation, moving beyond merely gathering data to a concentrated effort that drives improvements and accountability.

In contrast, the other descriptions do not convey the essence of thoughtful evaluation planning. Merely focusing on quantitative evaluations overlooks the importance of qualitative data and comprehensive insights. A random collection of data lacks the systematic approach required for meaningful evaluation, which could lead to inconclusive or misleading results. Finally, disregarding stakeholder input can compromise the evaluation’s relevance and effectiveness, as stakeholders can provide valuable perspectives that help shape the evaluation framework.